Eye on violence
Schools beef up security, find new ways to curb problems
- By Richard S. Clayton and Susan Gordon
- The Columbian and The News Tribune
Fort Vancouver High School is beginning to resemble its namesake.
The school that was named for a 19th century frontier outpost has become
a modern-day fortress of electronic surveillance, mandatory I.D. tags and
ever-present security guards.
Like most schools in Washington, Fort Vancouver has never seen the deadly
violence that killed two students and a teacher three years ago at Frontier
Junior High School in Moses Lake or two students in last year's shootings
in Springfield, Ore.
But Fort Vancouver and schools large and small around the state now prepare
for the worst. Some are adding high-tech tools such as surveillance cameras,
changing the architectural design of new schools and hiring their own police
force to patrol campus.
Violence prevention isn't just a matter of gadgets and gimmicks. It involves
school training programs that help teachers keep kids in line, DARE-like
instruction to keep gangs from flourishing and parent training sessions
to bring the message home.
Administrators are focusing on the little things before they grow into
major problems.
"Bullying and putting people down are one of the biggest sources
of violence in our schools," said Jerry Painter, general counsel of
the 67,000-member Washington Education Association.
"It starts out small, but unfortunately, too often it ends up big
and tragic."
In the state's urban districts, violence prevention has been a focus
for years. In addition to weaving the topic into curriculum, schools provide
peer mediation, anger management and other instruction.
Whether Washington's schools are any safer as a result is unclear. Evidence
is scarce. Schools offer anecdotal proof of improvements.
But studies and observers have found popular anti-violence programs and
security improvements sometimes are ineffective.
Jesus Villahermosa is a Pierce County sheriff's deputy who runs a private
safety consulting business. For years, he noticed schools were reluctant
to admit or prepare for potential violence on campus. They often feared
it might prompt parents to withdraw students or vote against funding levies,
he said.
But increased discipline problems, the media spotlight on recent school
shootings and the growing potential for legal liability have prompted a
new approach. Even schools where discipline and violence are minimal have
begun looking at prevention, Villahermosa said.
His 10-year-old consulting business has doubled its clients in the past
year.
More than 100 of Washington's 296 districts have hired Villahermosa to
offer safety training courses to teachers, parents and students.
"They are getting beyond the politics," he said. "They
are realizing safety is something we need to address."
No lockers, fewer doors
Physical changes occurring on campuses across Washington are the most
visible sign of growing concern about school safety.
Last year, Fort Vancouver High School completed a $17.3 million facelift.
Along with adding and upgrading classrooms, the school district removed
student lockers, added 24 security cameras and reconfigured the building's
entrances.
The lockers were ditched to reduce problems in the halls, eliminate hefty
repair bills and reduce places where students can store weapons or drugs.
"It seems any time there was a confrontation, it was around lockers,"
said Pat Friauf, principal of Columbia River High School, another Vancouver
campus that recently removed most of its lockers.
The remodeling at Fort Vancouver added a more prominent front entrance
and moved the main office next to the entrance. The changes make it easier
for staff to watch people as they enter the building.
Security cameras are among the most common additions at new schools and
old ones.
Eastmont Junior High in East Wenatchee installed six cameras two years
ago. Discipline and vandalism weren't on the rise. Rather, expansions to
the school created a maze of hard-to-patrol hallways.
With one camera in each hallway, an assistant principal can watch much
of the school on monitors in his office. Administrators still patrol between
classes.
The cameras "mean we don't have a lot of trouble," said Joel
Thaut, assistant superintendent.
The state's fastest-growing school district, Evergreen in Vancouver,
has installed cameras in all of its high schools and junior highs. Some
of the cameras are so small, they can be hidden in clocks or smoke detectors.
The most notorious school security tool, metal detectors, is rare in
Washington schools. The state's largest and most urban district, Seattle,
uses hand-held detectors and larger stationary ones that are moved between
schools following reports of weapons.
"We are not trying to intimidate students," said security manager
Larry Farrar. "We are trying to make this safe and secure" for
students.
Raising discipline standards
While few schools can afford design changes to enhance security, virtually
all schools are stressing violence prevention through staff and student
training.
The Washington Association of School Administrators has begun conducting
safety audits. Spokane, first up, scored well: The panel recommended additional
staff training but found principals had control of their schools and counselors
were sensitive to the warning signs of troubled students.
In Moses Lake, where the school shootings touched off a statewide debate
on safety, the district has introduced a combination of external safety
measures and preventive programs.
Two security officers work at the middle school now; an alternative middle
school program opened a year ago; and all the elementary schools teach peer
mediation. An after-school program sponsored by the Youth Partnership Task
Force targets at-risk high school students.
Niki Greenwalt is a junior who was in Barry Loukaitis' math class the
day he started shooting. For Greenwalt, the best thing that's happened since
the tragedy is this: "People realize they can go and talk to a counselor
now."
Schools also are toughening their discipline standards. Threats and disrespect
that might have been overlooked in the past now are taken seriously.
Harry Amend, superintendent of tiny Freeman School District near Spokane,
had a stack of suspension forms three-quarters of an inch thick on his desk
in mid-December. That's a lot for a district with fewer than 900 students.
First-time verbal threats or intimidation against a student or teacher
usually earn a suspension of one to ten days.
"We are trying to make them say we are in charge and they are going
to comply," said Amend, a past president of the Washington Association
of School Administrators. "We just want them to say 'Uncle.' "
Spokane School District plans to start a pilot program this spring for
dangerous and chronically disruptive elementary students. The idea of pulling
those students together into one classroom causes officials some concern.
But they hope to give those students both reading and writing, as well as
the basics of recreation and culture which they may have missed out on.
"This is habilitating. It's not rehabilitating because they never
learned in the first place," said Mary Brown, head of student services
in Spokane. Community resources will be needed to do all she envisions with
this program, she added.
Some schools have implemented zero-tolerance policies for fights, which
means both parties are punished, no matter who started it. It works, say
administrators, who claim the policies have reduced the number of campus
scuffles.
"The important thing is clarity and consistency, not severity,"
said Denise Gottfredson, a University of Maryland professor doing a national
study of school-based crime prevention programs.
"Some schools are expelling kids for carrying pocketknives and things
like that," she said. That's going too far, she said, because kicking
children out undermines the school's ability to control behavior.
At Firgrove Elementary School in the Tacoma suburb of Puyallup, efforts
to prevent violence start young.
The essence of the school's upbeat campaign for peace is captured in
the lyrics of songs like Hands, which are sung at every grade level.
Hands are not for pushing and shoving.
Wave your hands, Say hello or goodbye,
Don't use your hands to make someone cry."
The ideals promoted by the songs are reinforced at periodic school assemblies.
In the classrooms, students learn conflict resolution and problem solving
skills. On the playgrounds, peer mediators intervene. Classrooms feature
"peace tables" where children meet and work out disputes.
Successful "peacemakers" are rewarded with colorful badges.
Their pictures line a bulletin board in the school foyer.
Parents love it.
"You can't teach the academics if kids are afraid of being beat
up or being teased or laughed at," said Sue Fuhlman, whose son Trevor
is a kindergartner.
"Kids want to do the right thing. Kids want to be safe," said
counselor Donna Egge, who started Firgrove's anti-violence initiative about
two years ago.
"Violence is a problem in our culture, and we need to start young,"
she said.
"I love it when I hear from parents, 'My kid said we should talk
about it, not fight about it.' "
The comprehensive approach at Firgrove isn't typical of most Washington
elementary schools, but it mirrors the kind of behavior modification efforts
that violence prevention experts applaud. The goal is to change the school
culture to one in which students reject violence, take responsibility for
their actions and treat each other with respect.
But is it working?
Many of the kinds of school violence prevention activities used nationwide
haven't proved effective. In most cases, it's because no one has bothered
to conduct a scientific study.
Even so, Gottfredson, the Maryland professor, said instructional programs
that teach children to resolve conflicts and control aggressive impulses
offer promise.
She's more enthusiastic about parent training programs, which she calls
"one of the most effective ways to prevent delinquency."
But no scientific research has been done on peer mediation, which is
popular at a number of Washington high schools. Administrators say it cuts
down on fights, but they offer only anecdotal evidence.
"We don't know whether it works or not," Gottfredson said.
She's also skeptical about the worth of campus security measures. Nothing
proves high security reduces campus violence. The only studies done simply
show the schools using such measures typically are those where high levels
of violence have been reported, she said.
A 1996 report by Emory University's Center for Injury Control determined
$20 million in security equipment purchased by Georgia schools had little
effect on school safety. Despite dozens of metal detectors, no guns were
discovered by the machines. Security cameras often were placed in areas
where teachers already patrolled.
"They were much more public relations type tools, as opposed to
truly a violence-prevention mechanism," said Dr. Knox Todd, an emergency
room and public health physician who worked on the report.
Schools can't depend on security systems alone, other experts say.
"If children have a mental set that violence is an OK behavior,
I don't care what type of weapon detectors you have in your school,"
said Trevor Gardner, a Michigan expert who specializes in school discipline
and violence.
"The check you really have to get to is their mind. Nothing physical
is going to stop them."
Carlos Sundermann, director of the National Safe Schools Center in Portland,
added a caution: Schools have a tendency to overreact to isolated incidents
of violence.
They need to determine their community's needs before adopting one-size-fits-all
safety strategies or purchasing expensive equipment because it worked at
other schools.
Even schools that are proactive don't often get much peace of mind.
No matter how ready you think you are, said David Halstead, Vancouver
School District's security administrator, "until the actual event occurs,
you don't know how well you are prepared." |